Data Hogo vs Snyk vs Aikido: Security Scanner Comparison (2026)

Snyk vs Aikido vs Data Hogo — three tools, three very different audiences, three very different price points. This comparison is honest: I build Data Hogo, so I have skin in the game, but I'll tell you exactly where each tool is the better choice.

Prices verified March 2026.

At a Glance

	Data Hogo	Snyk	Aikido Security
Free tier	3 scans/mo, 1 public repo	200 tests/mo, open source	No meaningful free tier
Entry paid price	$12/mo	$125/mo (5-seat min)	~$299/mo
Target audience	Solo devs, small teams, vibecoders	Enterprise security teams	Funded startups, mid-market
Secrets detection	Yes	Yes	Yes
Dependency scanning	Yes (npm audit + OSV)	Yes (industry-leading)	Yes
SAST (code patterns)	Yes (250+ Semgrep rules)	Yes (custom engine)	Yes
Security headers	Yes	No	No
Database rules (RLS)	Yes	No	No
Cloud CSPM	No	No (add-on)	Yes
Container scanning	No	Yes	Yes
Auto-fix PRs	Yes (Pro, $39/mo)	Yes (paid)	Yes (paid)
Spanish language support	Yes	No	No

Snyk — Still the Industry Standard for Enterprise SCA

Snyk's reputation is earned. Its Software Composition Analysis (SCA) database — the catalog of known vulnerabilities in open-source packages — is the most comprehensive in the industry. If you're managing a large dependency tree and need confidence that every CVE is tracked and prioritized, Snyk is the benchmark.

The GitHub PR integration works well. When a dependency scan finds a vulnerability, Snyk opens a fix PR automatically. For teams with a security engineer who reads dashboards and needs audit trails, Snyk's reporting covers the compliance requirements.

Where Snyk shines:

Largest vulnerability database for dependency scanning
Mature enterprise features (SSO, audit logs, compliance reports)
Strong SAST coverage for multiple languages
PR-native workflow — findings appear directly in GitHub checks

Where Snyk falls short for most developers:

The pricing structure assumes you're a company. The free tier is 200 tests per month on open-source only. Private repos, auto-fix PRs, and most integrations require the Team plan — $25/developer/month with a minimum of 5 seats. That's $125/month even for a solo developer.

Snyk doesn't scan security headers or database rules (like Supabase RLS policies). If your security surface includes a deployed URL and a Supabase backend — which it does for most modern web apps — you need additional tools alongside Snyk.

The UI is built for security engineers, not developers. A wall of CVE numbers without clear prioritization isn't useful if you're the developer who also has to fix everything.

Bottom line on Snyk: The right tool if you have a security team, compliance requirements, and a budget. The wrong tool if you're a solo developer or a team of three building a SaaS.

Aikido Security — Cloud-First for Funded Startups

Aikido positions itself between Snyk (enterprise) and the basic tools. The defining feature is cloud security posture management (CSPM) — Aikido connects to your AWS, GCP, or Azure account and audits your cloud configuration alongside your code.

If you're deploying on AWS and worried about S3 bucket permissions, IAM role scope creep, or security group misconfiguration, Aikido's cloud coverage is genuinely useful. It's also strong on container image scanning and infrastructure-as-code (IaC) analysis.

Where Aikido shines:

Cloud CSPM — AWS, GCP, Azure security posture
Container image scanning
License compliance tracking
Infrastructure-as-code analysis
Cleaner UI than Snyk for engineering leads

Where Aikido falls short:

Pricing starts at approximately $299/month for small teams (early 2026 pricing — check aikido.dev for current rates). That's aimed at startups with at least some funding, not indie developers or bootstrapped teams.

Aikido doesn't scan security headers or database-level rules. Like Snyk, its focus is on the code and infrastructure layer — not the runtime behavior of your deployed app.

If you're not deploying on AWS/GCP/Azure — say, you're on Vercel + Supabase — the CSPM features don't apply to your stack. You'd be paying for coverage you can't use.

Bottom line on Aikido: Strong choice if you have cloud infrastructure to audit and a budget for it. Less useful for serverless + managed-service architectures where there's no cloud config to scan.

Data Hogo — Built for the Stack You're Actually Using

I'll be straightforward: I built Data Hogo because every tool I tried either didn't cover the vulnerabilities I cared about or cost more than the project it was protecting.

The design premise is different from Snyk and Aikido. Instead of starting from enterprise compliance requirements and working backward, Data Hogo starts from the actual attack surface of a modern web app:

Secrets in the codebase — API keys, tokens, credentials committed to git
Vulnerable dependencies — npm packages with known CVEs
Code pattern vulnerabilities — injection, broken auth, path traversal, XSS (250+ Semgrep rules)
Misconfigured settings — debug mode in production, insecure defaults
Missing security headers — CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options on your deployed URL
Broken database rules — Supabase RLS policies and Firebase rules

Points 5 and 6 are what Snyk and Aikido don't cover. For a Vercel + Supabase app (which describes most Next.js indie projects), those two surfaces are where the most critical vulnerabilities often live. We've seen Supabase projects where RLS was disabled on the users table — all user data readable by any authenticated user — while the code itself was clean.

Where Data Hogo shines:

Full-surface coverage for modern web app stacks (code + headers + DB rules)
Plain-English explanations — not CVE numbers, not CVSS scores
Framework-specific detection (Next.js, Supabase, Firebase patterns)
Price: $0 free, $12/mo Basic, $39/mo Pro with auto-fix PRs
Spanish language interface and support (the only security scanner in this comparison that does this)
No seat minimums — $12/month is $12/month for one developer or ten

Where Data Hogo falls short:

Cloud infrastructure scanning (AWS IAM, S3, VPC) is not in scope. If your security concern is cloud misconfiguration, Aikido is the better tool.

Snyk's vulnerability database is more mature than the OSV + npm audit combination Data Hogo uses. For projects with complex dependency trees and a need for every CVE tracked, Snyk has more depth.

Data Hogo is also newer — Snyk and Aikido have years of enterprise deployments and compliance certifications (SOC 2, etc.) if that matters for your procurement process.

For a deeper comparison specifically between Data Hogo and Snyk on features, check the free Snyk alternatives guide.

Scan your repo free — see what Data Hogo finds →

Pricing Comparison

All prices verified March 2026.

Plan	Data Hogo	Snyk	Aikido
Free	$0 / 3 scans / 1 public repo	$0 / 200 tests / open source only	$0 (trial only)
Entry paid	$12/mo — 15 scans, 5 repos	$125/mo (5 seats × $25)	~$299/mo
Mid tier	$39/mo — 500 scans, unlimited repos + auto-fix	$25/dev/mo (10+ devs)	Custom
Enterprise	Not applicable	Custom	Custom

The pricing gap is real. $12/month vs $125/month minimum is not a "you get less" tradeoff — it reflects entirely different target audiences.

Who Should Use Which Tool

Use Data Hogo if:

You're a solo developer or team under 10
Your stack is Next.js, Supabase, Firebase, or similar
You want plain-English findings, not CVE dashboards
You need Spanish language support
You're bootstrapped or cost-conscious

Use Snyk if:

You have a security engineer or team
Compliance requirements (SOC 2, ISO 27001) are part of procurement
You have complex dependency trees that need mature SCA coverage
Your team already uses GitHub PR gates for security checks
Budget is $125+/month

Use Aikido if:

You deploy on AWS, GCP, or Azure and want CSPM coverage
You're scanning container images in your CI pipeline
You're a funded startup with $299+/month to invest in security tooling
Infrastructure-as-code (Terraform, Cloudformation) is part of your stack

For more detailed Snyk comparisons, the Snyk vs Aikido comparison covers how those two tools stack up against each other specifically.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does Aikido Security pricing compare to Snyk?

Aikido Security starts at approximately $299/month for small teams (verified early 2026), which is lower than Snyk's enterprise-focused pricing but still aimed at funded startups and growing engineering teams. Snyk's Team plan is $25 per developer per month with a 5-seat minimum ($125/month minimum). Neither tool has a competitive free tier for private repos.

What does Aikido Security scan that Snyk doesn't?

Aikido covers cloud security posture management (CSPM) — AWS, GCP, Azure configurations — which Snyk's standard plans don't include. Aikido also includes container image scanning, license compliance, and broader infrastructure-as-code analysis. Snyk's strength is its vulnerability database depth for dependency scanning (SCA).

Is Data Hogo a good alternative to Snyk for solo developers?

Yes. Data Hogo is specifically built for the gap Snyk doesn't serve: solo developers and small teams who need real security coverage without a $125/month minimum. The free plan covers secrets, dependencies, code patterns, config, headers, and database rules for public repos. Paid plans start at $12/month — no seat minimums.

Which security scanner is best for Next.js and Supabase projects?

Data Hogo has the most specific coverage for the Next.js + Supabase stack — it scans Supabase RLS policies, Next.js config patterns, and deployed security headers alongside code and dependency scanning. Snyk and Aikido have broader coverage but less framework-specific depth for this stack.

Does Snyk have a free plan in 2026?

Snyk has a free tier limited to 200 tests per month on open-source projects. It does not include auto-fix PRs, and upgrading requires a minimum of 5 seats at $25/developer/month — $125/month total minimum. The free tier is viable for open source projects with low scan frequency.

The honest answer: these are tools for different problems. Snyk and Aikido are built for security teams at companies. Data Hogo is built for developers who are also responsible for their own security, which is most of us.

See what your repo's security score looks like →